The Prada Guide to Dressing for Doomsday#

Fashion Review

Bras, bloomers and fancy frocks were all in the mix. But it’s not about the items; it’s about the approach.

Prada’s lineup of unexpected looks for unexpected times.Credit...Simbarashe Cha/The New York Times

Sept. 26, 2025

So there you are at your office, ready to roll up your shirtsleeves and get down to it in a light blue boiler suit, epaulets on the shoulders and patch pockets on the front, when suddenly you get an invitation to the opera. Do you panic and run home to change? Do you refuse to attend because you don’t have the right thing to wear?

Or do you simply pull on a pair of elbow-length satin gloves, slip on some bejeweled pumps and sparkling drop earrings, and head out?

Say you are sitting at home in your underwear, when a natural disaster looms. Do you pause to change into something more appropriate, or just add a pea-green chore jacket, grab a handbag, and go?

Say you are faced with a confluence of unexpected events and don’t have time to figure out an outfit amid the chaos. Don’t fret. Adapt.

Image

Underwear under outerwear, at Prada.Credit...Prada

Image

Uniform dressing with opera gloves. Why not?Credit...Prada

Such was the life lesson of the Prada show on Thursday, told through clothes. Miuccia Prada and Raf Simons, the co-creative directors of the brand, have never exactly been pegged as doomsday preppers, but that was the vibe. Backstage, watching them practically disappear amid a tsunami of well-wishers, you could understand why. They did set the show atop a floor the shade of an orange hazmat suit.

The result was an argument for the need to make do and — not mend, but mix and unmatch, using the clothes on your back or at hand (or in the Prada archive). Because you never know what bad, or maybe good, but these days probably bad, thing is going to happen next.

It’s an alluring idea in theory. There’s liberation in the imperative to toss out old assumptions about what should be worn with what, where and how, and ignore genre conventions as exigencies require.

In execution, though, it was somewhat less persuasive.

Video

CreditCredit...Video by Simbarashe Cha

For every great combination of opposites — like the daffodil-yellow party frock under a military parka with opera gloves and clutch bag, or the celadon 1960s cocktail dress with a pink bejeweled neckline tossed like a sweatshirt over a tangerine taffeta pouf of a skirt — there were some hypotheticals that didn’t quite come off.

Like for example, the scraps of fabric that looked like bras with the structure taken out, or maybe just the idea of a bra or the anamnesis of a bra, rather than any sort of actual support garment.

“A useless bra,” Mrs. Prada called it backstage. In Prada-land, uselessness can be a thought experiment, and in a Darwinian world, it’s a luxury. But whether anyone will want to spend Prada money on a useless garment — or should — is debatable (though possible, given Mrs. Prada’s track record in her other gig at Miu Miu when it comes to influencers and impractical clothing). And so it went.

For every terrific hybrid, like the wrap skirt pieced together from three or four or even five different swaths of lace and pleated wool and cancan ruffles, there was a kind of silly one, like the — what to call them? — suspended skirts. Imagine a flimsy tube, hung from straps over the shoulders, that looked like a cross between an apron and a weightlifter’s onesie (or a tote bag for the body) and sagged just below the belly, and you’ll get the idea.

Mixing and unmatching in the Prada spring 2026 collection.Credit...Clockwise from top left: Prada, Simbarashe Cha/The New York Times, Daniele Venturelli/WireImage, via Getty Images, Prada.

And for every great ladylike jacket, for every single-breasted suit coat, there was a bloomer: short, puffy and with elastic at the waist and legs like a pull-on diaper. They may be, as Mr. Simons insisted backstage, “a Prada thing since forever”; a remembrance of childhoods past. But they are also infantilizing — not really a desirable quality in a survival guide to dress and contemporary existence.

Still, even the failed ideas underscored that fact that at least Mrs. Prada and Mr. Simons have ideas. Sometimes they are brilliant ideas and sometimes they are silly ideas, but either way the designers have the gumption to try them out. It’s a rarer occurrence than one might like to think in fashion. And it is also why the brand occupies such a mythic place in the styleverse, and why what may seem inexplicable from the outside still gets so many hosannas in the room.

In any case, one point was clear: A pair of satin opera gloves in your back pocket, and you’re pretty much ready for anything.

Vanessa Friedman has been the fashion director and chief fashion critic for The Times since 2014.